Editor's note: Our Ross Devonport and Michael Hurcomb read, write and analyze everything Fantasy Hockey on a daily basis for CBSSports.com. They agree and disagree on a variety of subjects on a weekly basis and will share their opinions on Fantasy-relevant topics each week.

Who will emerge in Edmonton now that Ales Hemsky (shoulder) is done for the season?
Michael Hurcomb Ross Devonport
Michael Hurcomb It's going to be the guy who is replacing Hemsky on the top line -- Gilbert Brule. The 22-year-old forward is having a breakout campaign under first-year coach Pat Quinn. He has four points in his first two games since replacing Hemsky and is up to 17 points in 24 games. Three more points and he sets a career high. Don't forget Brule was the sixth overall pick in the 2005 draft, but Columbus rushed him to the NHL when he clearly wasn't ready. He is starting to tap into his potential and could be a serious scoring threat for Edmonton. Ross Devonport While Brule is definitely a solid pick in this spot, I think Patrick O'Sullivan might have a chance to get things going with a move to the second line. He has struggled this season and has no points in his last four games, but O'Sullivan knows he'll have to pick up the pace if he wants Pat Quinn to continue giving him a chance on a scoring line rather than on the fourth one, where he has been languishing all season. O'Sullivan has offensive skills but has lacked consistency and is getting very close to being considered an NHL bust. Hopefully he can shed that tag over the next few months.
Would a trade benefit Vincent Lecavalier and reestablish him as an elite Fantasy option?
Michael Hurcomb Ross Devonport
Michael Hurcomb It clearly can't hurt. I will say it -- Steven Stamkos has passed Lecavalier on the talent depth chart, and Tampa Bay has to start looking toward the future and making Stamkos its marquee player. I thought the duo could co-exist like Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby, but Lecavalier is no longer holding up his end of the bargain. Since February of last season, Stamkos has totaled 34 goals while Vinny has 12. The Lightning could definitely clear some cap space by dumping Lecavalier's mega deal and the Canadiens probably wouldn't mind taking the All-Star center off their hands. Ross Devonport There's certainly a chance it could, but it's no guarantee. Maybe Lecavalier is just a guy who had his two great years while the Lightning were a decent team and is just going to be a point-per-game guy after all unless he's surrounded by a pair of elite wingers. At the moment he has Alex Tanguay and Jeff Halpern alongside him, neither of whom is Martin St. Louis. If you can find an owner willing to take Vinnie off your hands, by all means do so, but you certainly could do worse at center and a trade might be just what he needs to get going later this season.
Who has been more disappointing -- Alexei Kovalev or Thomas Vanek?
Michael Hurcomb Ross Devonport
Michael Hurcomb I'm taking Kovalev. Ottawa signed the veteran forward in the offseason to help offset the potential loss of Dany Heatley. Once Ottawa dealt their disgruntled star, the Senators felt confident that Kovalev would help the fans forget about the All-Star winger. It hasn't happened. Kovalev has scored in only four of 21 games and has gone a month without finding the back of the net. He is on pace for only 37 points, which would be his lowest output since 2006-07. He clearly isn't an 80-point threat anymore, but we would take 50 points as this rate. Ross Devonport Kovalev isn't a huge shock because he's been inconsistent with his point production throughout his career, which shows the Russian's success really depends on who he's partnered with. So, instead I'm going with Vanek, who is on pace for just 28 goals after averaging 39.7 goals over his previous seasons and never finishing with less than 36 goals during that span. I mean, it's not like Buffalo changed much this offseason, either, so I'm just stumped at what Vanek's issue is. He has been picking up the pace lately though, so maybe he's finally figured things out.
Would you consider Jonathan Quick a No. 1 Fantasy goalie?
Michael Hurcomb Ross Devonport
Michael Hurcomb At first glance the easy answer would be no. But under further examination, it's hard to argue against Quick as a No. 1 goalie. First, he is a goaltender that starts pretty much every night. He has appeared in 25 of the Kings' 27 games. Secondly, he is among the league leaders in many stats. He tied for second in wins (14) and fifth in saves (597). In standard Fantasy leagues, he is also seventh in scoring for goalies (123.9) and ahead of players like Marc-Andre Fleury, Henrik Lundqvist and Cristobal Huet, who many view as must-start Fantasy options. Ross Devonport After his super-hot start to the season, Quick had calmed down a bit before his solid Fantasy Week 8 (Nov. 23-29). Despite his semi-slump, Quick is still playing at a high level and the Kings just seem like the real deal. However, I doubt many Fantasy owners out there are using him as a No. 1 Fantasy option, so it's hard for me to consider him that just yet. A high-end No. 2 option for sure, and Quick is definitely worth using in all single-goalie formats when the matchups favor him, but I don't think two months of success is enough to make him a concrete No. 1.

Do you agree with Ross or Michael? Send your thoughts to DMFantasyPucks@cbs.com and we'll post the best responses. Be sure to put Attn: Fantasy Faceoff in the subject field. Include your full name, hometown and state.