What can we realistically expect from 32-year-old Adrian Peterson next season?

No one was surprised when the Vikings decided in February to let Adrian Peterson walk instead of paying him $18 million next season. The 2007 first-round pick, long considered the best running back in the NFL, was hampered by a knee injury last season, and at 32, history suggests he's well past his prime.

But by late April, the Saints had signed Peterson to a two-year deal. On the surface, the best-case scenario was that Peterson would be able to spell feature back Mark Ingram. But voluntary workouts have Peterson's new teammates marveling at how much he resembles, well, Adrian Peterson.

"He's a stud, man. He looks the part," Saints quarterback Drew Brees said in early June. "There's something about handing the ball off to that guy and watching him run through the hole and take on anybody who tries to tackle him."

Saints left tackle Terron Armstead added: "I'm amazed, honestly. Seeing him just take off his first few steps are as explosive as I've ever seen by a human being. It's unbelievable. I'm very excited to see him when the pads come on."

And here's Saints safety Kenny Vaccaro: "It's ridiculous. He has not lost any steps. Wait, just watch. He's so explosive ... just in flat shoes out there."

Peterson has said that he feels like he could play till 37 or 38 -- "approaching 40," even -- which brings us back to Vaccaro.

"Like he's not lying, y'all, he's playing til he's 40," Vaccaro said recently. "I'm telling y'all. Y'all about to see like when he tore his knee and came back and ran for 2,000 yards. Now, obviously, we aren't gonna just feed him like that ... but he is gonna be a factor."

Vaccaro's referring to when Peterson tore his ACL in December 2011, rehabbed all offseason and started 16 games in 2012 rushing for 2,097 yards (6.0 YPC) and 12 touchdowns. It was superhuman, even in the finely-tuned world of professional athletics. But now Peterson is 32 and coming off a meniscus injury that sidelined him for three months last season -- and limited him to just 37 carries, a 1.9 yards-per-carry average and zero touchdowns.

Put another way: Can Peterson do what other running backs on the downside of great careers couldn't? Namely: Outrun Father Time?

This is my 20th year covering the NFL. I’ve never heard players hype someone the way the Saints talked about Adrian Peterson on Thursday.
— Jeff Duncan (@JeffDuncan_) June 2, 2017

Before we try to predict the future, let's first look at just how dominant Peterson was for much of his first decade in the league with both conventional stats and Football Outsiders' total-value metric.

2007: 14 games, 1,341 yards, 5.6 YPC, 12 TDs, No. 4 in total value;
2008: 16 games, 1,760 yards, 4.8 YPC, 10 TDs, No. 17 in total value;
2009: 16 games, 1,383 yards, 4.4 YPC, 18 TDs, No. 10 in total value;
2010: 15 games, 1,298 yards, 4.6 YPC, 12 TDs, No. 6 in total value;
2011*: 12 games, 970 yards, 4.7 YPC, 12 TDs, No. 9 in total value;
2012: 16 games, 2,0976 yards, 6.0 YPC, 12 TDs, No. 1 in total value;
2013: 14 games, 1,266 yards, 4.5 YPC, 10 TDs, No. 25 in total value;
2014**: 1 game, 75 yards, 3.6 YPC, 0 TDs;
2015: 16 games, 1,485 yards, 4.5 YPC, 11 TDs, No. 6 in total value;
2016: 3 games, 72 yards, 1.9 YPC, 0 TDs;

* Peterson tore his ACL in a Week 16 game against the Redskins. Seven months later he not only returned to the Vikings' lineup, he finished the 2012 season as the NFL's highest-rated running back.

** Peterson played in just one game before he was suspended for the rest of the season due to a child-abuse case.

Peterson was a top back in 2015 and perhaps he would still be in Minnesota if he hadn't gotten injured last season. But he did, the Vikings moved on and the Saints feel like Peterson can be an integral part of their offense even if he is on the wrong side of 30.

"I'd be lying to you say it doesn't give you a chip (on your shoulder). Especially being a competitor," Peterson said last week, via the New Orleans Advocate's Nick Underhill. "It's not my main focus. It's something that drives you a little bit. After 30, because it was the same back then. 'Oh, he's 30.' Then I ended up leading the league in 2015. Same thing the next year. Stuff will continue to repeat itself until I finish."

Peterson's right, of course, which brings us to our next question: What does history say about when he will be finished?

Let's start with the top-10 running backs from their age-32 season (from 2000-2016):

Player	Year	Team	G	Att	Yds	YPA	YPG	TD
Ricky Williams	2009	Dolphins	16	241	1121	4.65	70.1	11
Emmitt Smith	2001	Cowboys	14	261	1021	3.91	72.9	3
Mike Anderson	2005	Broncos	15	239	1014	4.24	67.6	12
Frank Gore	2015	Colts	16	260	967	3.72	60.4	6
Jerome Bettis	2004	Steelers	15	250	941	3.76	62.7	13
DeAngelo Williams	2015	Steelers	16	200	907	4.54	56.7	11
Thomas Jones	2010	Chiefs	16	245	896	3.66	56	6
Fred Jackson	2013	Bills	16	206	890	4.32	55.6	9
Corey Dillon	2006	Patriots	16	199	812	4.08	50.8	13
Garrison Hearst	2003	49ers	12	178	768	4.31	64	3

That's an impressive list that includes three 1,000-yard rushers. Put another way: It's reasonable to think that Peterson could have a Peterson-like season in 2017. But don't expect that productivity to last; here are the top-10 backs from their age-33 season:

Player	Year	Team	G	Att	Yds	YPC	YPG	TD
Frank Gore	2016	Colts	16	263	1025	3.90	64.1	4
Emmitt Smith	2002	Cowboys	16	254	975	3.84	60.9	5
Warrick Dunn	2008	Bucs	15	186	786	4.23	52.4	2
Ricky Williams	2010	Dolphins	16	159	673	4.23	42.1	2
Antowain Smith	2005	Dains	16	166	659	3.97	41.2	3
Terry Allen	2001	Ravens	11	168	658	3.92	59.8	3
Fred Jackson	2014	Bills	14	141	525	3.72	37.5	2
Thomas Jones	2011	Chiefs	16	153	478	3.12	29.9	0
Darren Sproles	2016	Eagles	15	94	438	4.66	29.2	2
Jerome Bettis	2005	Steelers	12	110	368	3.35	30.7	9
DeAngelo Williams	2016	Steelers	9	98	343	3.5	38.1	4

The numbers are down across the board -- from attempts, to total yards, to yards per carry to touchdowns. And that's to be expected because running back is among the most fungible positions in football; teams can find comparable -- or better -- production from younger, cheaper players. It's why you don't see high-priced running backs in their 30s littering NFL rosters while the Tom Bradys of the world can still be at the top of their game as a soon-to-be 40-year-old.

Because we're curious -- and because Peterson mentioned that he could see himself playing until he was 38 -- here are the combined season totals for the top running backs, age 34-38:

Player	From	To	G	Att	Yds	YPC	YPG	TD	Yrs	Age
Emmitt Smith	2003	2004	25	357	1193	3.34	47.7	11	2	35
Ricky Williams	2011	2011	16	108	444	4.11	27.8	2	1	34
Dorsey Levens	2004	2004	15	94	410	4.36	27.3	4	1	34
Lorenzo Neal	2004	2008	77	99	348	3.52	4.5	1	5	38
Kimble Anders	2000	2000	15	76	331	4.36	22.1	2	1	34
Mack Strong	2005	2007	37	54	246	4.56	6.6	1	3	36
Zack Crockett	2006	2007	17	40	163	4.08	9.6	0	2	35
Tony Richardson	2005	2009	71	35	158	4.51	2.2	0	5	38
Fred Taylor	2010	2010	7	43	155	3.6	22.1	0	1	34
Larry Centers	2002	2003	25	32	138	4.31	5.5	2	2	35
Priest Holmes	2007	2007	4	46	137	2.98	34.3	0	1	34
Thurman Thomas	2000	2000	9	28	136	4.86	15.1	0	1	34

Notice the right-most column. That's the age these backs -- many of whom were fullbacks and still contributed as blockers -- last played in the NFL. A feature back's existence, in general, burns brightly before flaming out. The good news is that Peterson could have a bounce-back year in '17 and live up to the praise we've heard from his new teammates in recent weeks. But the reality is that, beyond next season, it's more likely than not that Peterson will be just a shell of himself. There is no shame in that because unless you're a franchise quarterback, professional football is a young man's game.

Then again, Peterson is more than your garden-variety feature back.

"If you can reverse Father Time, maybe he knows him," Saints defensive end Cameron Jordan said recently, via NOLA.com. "I don't know, but either way, I'm going to be getting real familiar with A.P. to understand how can I move as he does at the age that he is."